VoidForm has identified 10 recurring technical claims and a proposed methodology regarding corrugated paper void forms that are not adequately supported by controlled comparative testing or rational evaluation. The issue is not whether void forms should be tested or analyzed (they should), but whether conclusions are being drawn from comparable data, representative exposure conditions, and a complete structural evaluation.

Download this concise engineering summary addressing incorrect recurring technical claims regarding degradable void forms. It includes the 10 most questionable claims, VoidForm’s full technical response, test comparisons, and questions engineers should be asking.